CLICK for Home Page and HR Administration Overview
Website Launched:  12/26/1994
Last Update:  2/14/2013
The Integrity Center, Inc.

(972) 484-6140
[ Since 1984 ]
HOME Reference Articles
 
SCREENING
Check List
Backgrounds
TUTORIALS
SERVICE MENU
FCRA
THIS COMPANY
Our Methods
Why Use Us
Myths
Pitfalls
CHECK MYSELF
CHECK NANNY
USEFUL LINKS
Library
Statistics
PRESS RELEASE
The Integrity News
Vol. XIII No. 16
ISSN 1081-2717

 


The Integrity Center, Inc.
'objective risk management services"


November 30, 2004 


Sarbanes-Oxley
and
Background Checking



We have received numerous calls from our public company ( issuer ) clients inquiring about what the  "Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002" ( SOX ) means to  their programs for background checking.

Please note in the following that it would be advisable for issuers, companies thinking of becoming issuers, and companies that may be acquired by issuers, to understand what is currently required, and what may be forthcoming.

Starting with calls to the Special Counsel, Division of Corporation Finance of the Securities and Exchange  Commission (SEC), we were eventually referred to  the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board  (PCAOB) that was created under Section 105 of SOX.   There, we found that our questions would be answered  by the attorney who is the ethics officer for the PCAOB.

SOX directs the PCAOB "to establish, by rule, fair procedures for the investigation and discipline of registered public accounting firms and associated persons of such firms". Section 103 of SOX "directs the PCAOB to establish auditing and related attestation, quality control, ethics, and independence standards and rules to be used by registered public accounting firms in the preparation and issuance of audit reports". Further, SOX "grants the PCAOB broad investigative  and disciplinary authority over registered public  accounting firms and persons associated with such firms".

Hence, the PCAOB was created to register and monitor public accounting firms and those firms are now known  as U.S. Public Accounting Firms. Those registered firms are the ONLY firms that can audit issuers. The audit  guidelines for those audit firms are the "effective"  rules --- that is, the PCAOB rules that have been  adopted by the PCAOB and approved by the SEC.

It is important to recognize that SOX was passed "to  oversee the auditors of public companies in order to  protect the interests of investors and further the public  interest in the preparation of informative, fair, and  independent audit reports".

Thus, the program is for the SEC via the PCAOB to  ride herd on the audit firms and provide them with the  audit rules so that they, the audit firms, can then ride  herd on the issuers.

With the above in mind, when we were asked to submit our question in writing to the PCAOB, we submitted the following: "With regard to background checks,  what RULES are the audit firms being told by the PCAOB to adhere to in this regard when auditing their public company clients ?"

We went on to say that "Our public company clients will do what is necessary to comply with both the  letter and the intent of an audit. However, in the event  that the background checking expected by the audit  firms, for the CEO and below, is greater than their  current in-house standards, how do they know what  they should be doing ? They would like to have us  be able to tell them the rules for audit-acceptable  background checking procedures. We need to get  those rules from the PCAOB."

The answer was that as of 11/24/04, there is no  PCAOB rule that directs audit firms on how to audit  public company background checking procedures.   However, before one interprets that as possibly  meaning that background checking is not important  to audits, realize that the PCAOB ethics officer said  that the long-standing Section 21(d)(2) of the Exchange  Act already addresses this issue.

The ethics officer also said that "any rules on this  subject in the future would appear on the PCAOB  website". So, it would be wise for those responsible  for background checking to become familiar with  www.pcaobus.org.

Government officials responsible for uncovering fraud  and the financing of terrorist acts will always tend toward  being cautious. Likewise, audit firms, being monitored by the PCAOB, will be cautious too --- and likely err on the side of requiring more, rather than less, background information. You must make a serious effort to keep  undesirable individuals out of your operations.

You can get the most recent information that we have  on SOX and other topics, including state-of-the-art HR  automation technology, by calling   The Integrity Center, Inc.   at   (972) 484-6140.   Helping you with your Risk Management and HR Automation is what we do.


EARLIER
NEWS ITEMS
The Resume
   Problem
Immigration Reform
   Will Mean:
   Employers MUST
   Enforce
   Employment
   Eligibility
   Verification
Economic
   Espionage
Guerrilla
   Reference
   Checks
The Mobile
   Integrity
   Connection (tm)
NEW U.S.
   Law Increases
   Employer Risk
Time
   To
   Shred
Three New
   H.R. Videos
"7 Ways
   To Avoid
   Employees From
   Hell"
Form I-9 Update
   and NEW
   Form I-9 Tools
New Federal Laws
   To Consider
Access To News
   Items For HR
   And Security
   Professionals
Sarbanes-Oxley
   and
   Background
   Checking
Using
   Credit Bureau
   Reports In The
   Hiring Process
Talent Assessments
   Before Mergers
   Acquisitions
   or Investments
Vicarious
   Liability
Medical
   Identity Theft
Federal
   Civil
   Litigation
   Histories
New Items
   for HR and
   Security
   Professionals
Employers
   Offer Help
   Fighting
   I.D. Theft
Avian Flu:
   Business Thinks
   The Unthinkable
New Federal
   Rules That
   Govern Online
   Recruiting
Gaffe Shows Need
   To Screen Current
   Employees At
   Promotion Time
The
   Baby Boomer
   Exodus
Document
   Disposal Law
   Kicked In
   June 1, 2005
A New Wrinkle
   On Age Bias
Don't Let Your
   Vendors
   Compromise
   Employee
   Identity Data
Annoying Hacking
   Has Now Become
   Organized Crime
Persuading
   Your Company
   Management To
   Encourage
   Training
Mainstream Media
   FINALLY Address
   Risks Of Using
   Databases For
   Employment
   Screening
HR Automation
   Can Improve
   Company Finances
   And Innovation
Employers Beware
   The
   "Seal of Approval"
Identity
   Verification
The
   Outsourcing
   Hole
Cyber Age
   Employee Crimes
Security Risk
   From Mobile
   Media Devices
More FCRA
   Amendments
   Could Be Coming
   By Year's End
The FCRA
   Was Amended
   On 12/4/03
Physical Security
   and Information
   Security are
   Merging
Increase
   HR Productivity
Homeland
   Security
   Guidelines
Sarbanes-Oxley:
   Road To
   Compliance
WARNING
Stored Data
   Warning Signs
How to FIND,
   FIX or FIRE,
   Your POOR
   PERFORMERS
ID Verification --
   Inexpensive and
   VERY Effective
The Darkest Side
   Of Identity Theft
Companies Dig
   Deeper Into
   Executive's Pasts
Fraud And New
   Scrutiny Of
   Executives
Be Careful With
   Instant Messaging
   and Wi-Fi
STRESS
Identity
   Management
California
   Data Privacy Rule
Obtaining
   Criminal Histories
   In New York State
"The Privacy Rule"
   in HIPAA
Putting A Crimp In
   The Management
   Of Spam
New Technology
   Facilitates
   Corporate
   Espionage
Identity Theft
   Checklist
Monitoring
   Employees
The Domestic
   Security
   Enhancement Act
NEW
   Overtime
   Pay Rules
The High Cost
   Of Penny-Ante
   Scams
"Signs" That
   You Need To Do A
   Periodic Check
FTC Charges A
   Company With
   FCRA Violations
The NEW
   Integrity
   Connection (tm)
Workplace
   Safety
   Checklist
HR is Splitting
   Into Two
   Separate Parts
Keep Your Eye On
   RFID Technology
Improv At
   The Interview
Real Security
   Won't Come Easy
   Or Cheap
DOs & DON'Ts
   To Minimize
   Violence
Identity
   Theft
Snapshots of
   Federal Laws
TIPS for
   Gramm-Leach-Bliley
   Compliance
The Sarbanes -
   Oxley Act
NEW Calif.
   Background
   Checking Laws
The Benefits
   Of Online
   Job Applications
Compensation
   --- Now It's
   Getting Personal
The United States
   Security Network
Supreme Court
Limits ADA
Supreme Court Will
   Review Law On
   Age Discrimination
Management Sleaze
The Examiner (tm)
Helps You Uncover
The New Face
Of Corporate
Responsibility
The Sarbanes-Oxley
   Corporate
   Reform Law
The Corporate Spy
National Wants and
   Warrants Illegal
No Dangerous
   Jobs For Disabled
Security
   Precautions
   for Businesses
Terminating
   An Employee
Listening in an
   Interview
Arbitration
   vs.
   Litigation
Supreme Court
   Eases Rules for
   Workers Who Sue
Drug Abuse
   Statistics
The Enemy
   Within
Priority:
   Integrity
Funding Terrorism
   With
   Information Theft
Corporate America
vs.
Copyright Theft
Mental Illness
   Workplace Costs
How to
   Fire Properly
Lying
   On Resumes
Workplace
   Guidelines
   To Be Voluntary